<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To John Woolman on John Locke &#038; John Adams</title>
	<link>http://jtblog.lindajohansen.com/2009/05/08/to-john-woolman-on-john-locke-john-adams/</link>
	<description>Some impressions on Faith, Prayer,....and maybe sport</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Findley</title>
		<link>http://jtblog.lindajohansen.com/2009/05/08/to-john-woolman-on-john-locke-john-adams/#comment-28</link>
		<author>Rachel Findley</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jtblog.lindajohansen.com/2009/05/08/to-john-woolman-on-john-locke-john-adams/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this note.

I enjoy seeing the two statements about "covenants" clearly set in the context of Enlightenment thinking.

I am not sure whether John Woolman was pre-Enlightenment or post-Enlightenment or whether he just bypassed the Enlightenment entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this note.</p>
<p>I enjoy seeing the two statements about &#8220;covenants&#8221; clearly set in the context of Enlightenment thinking.</p>
<p>I am not sure whether John Woolman was pre-Enlightenment or post-Enlightenment or whether he just bypassed the Enlightenment entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

