- Conversations with Remarkable Friends (13)
- Faith & Practice (7)
- Flexing some forms (2)
- Food (1)
- Journal (33)
- Keeping low (12)
- Neighborhood (1)
- Physical activity (7)
- Prayer (5)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Monday, November 14, 2011: Simplicity and learning transfer
- Tuesday, September 20, 2011: What does Beanite mean?
- Tuesday, August 30, 2011: Honks and labels
- Monday, February 7, 2011: More autobiography in outline form
- Sunday, February 6, 2011: Outline of a spiritual autobiography
- Monday, December 6, 2010: Cucumbers, Advent and immanence
- Monday, September 27, 2010: about the Blog title (reprise)
- Monday, September 27, 2010: Disclaimers and assurances (reprise)
- Wednesday, August 11, 2010: It is enough
- Sunday, April 4, 2010: Intergenerational Worship
Blogroll
- A Passionate and Determined Quest for Adequacy
- A Silly Poor Gospel
- Embracing Complexity
- Gregg's Gambles
- Imperfect Serenity
- Julie
- Linda Johansen
- One Quaker Take
- Other Stuff
- Quaker Quaker
- Ride Herd
- stony run farm
- Tables, Chairs and Oaken Chests
- the Garden at Lincoln School
- The Good Raised Up
- The Quaker Ranter
- The Red Electric
- Travis
- What Canst Thou Say?
- November 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- August 2008
- January 2008
- October 2007
- September 2007
- September 2006
Principles & Testimonies
By words it is not possible to judge another’s approach. Words speak only the dead ideas that may flow from a living Spirit or an active–but essentially lifeless–principle. Or they may flow from self seeking motivation cloaked in high language and good thoughts. The news has brought us some stories of prominent preachers brought low when their self seeking was discovered.
This distinction is at the root of the differing experience around perfection. Fox, underpinned by the leading of the Light–touching his very personal self from the moment he was coming into the world–could make claims that Paul and Winstanely (I think.) would admit they’d fall short of–because they were at heart the old man with a new man’s cloak.
What claims can we make? What can we live up to? What is underpinning me? As I teach? As I write? As I love?
Few Friends–indeed few persons anywhere–can honestly claim to know intimately in each moment that they rest in the womb of God. Most of us yearn for such peace but see it as a distant heaven, far removed from our present experience.
Smith, 2005. PH 378, pp. 24 & 25.
My experience suggests that I’m far too critical of my states of consciousness when I’m in them. [That’s a bear of a concept to put on paper!] In reflection on a day, I can see that the Lord was working in my life–and in my soul–throughout its course. A long range view of my degree of being in touch looks more positive than my momentary awareness. I pray that I’m not being simply self congratulatory so I can feel good in hindsight.
I’m learning over years the positive nature of the practices of muddling through. We can seek the best in each decision while being aware that few of these choices are monumental and most can be revisited. Then we practice discernment often and improve our skills by small steps. We goof up and try over. The inward experience isn’t soul shattering but the fruits of the practice are pretty good.
With all this sensing, trying, goofing and changing, can we call it perfection? Perhaps not. But is the natural, evolved world perfect in some sense?
Rather than saving discernment under leading for the great decisions of life, I am starting to use it for the small ones–feeling and sensing my way through while giving thanks and asking for guidance and blessing.